The US House Rules were adopted for the 118th Congress 2023-2025 by a house resolution on Jan 9, 2023.
The House adopted its rules package for the 118th Congress on the evening of Monday, January 9. 2023 - (118th US House Rule Changes Only) (See Section 1 Page 1 4-8 and Page 2 1-4.)
https://rules.house.gov/sites/republicans.rules118.house.gov/files/117-House-Rules-Clerk.pdf - (117th US House Rules that were adoped in the 118th US House rules.)
Rule 1 of 117th US House Rules:
(The Speaker) 12.(b)(1)
To suspend the business of the House when notified of an immenent threat to its safety, the speaker may declare an emergency recess subject to the call of the chair.
This is the rule change Pelosi made to the us House rules that allowed her to declare an emergency recess at ANY time.
This rule change was used 2 minutes before an electorial college vote objection was about to be heard.
What you need to understand is the fact that NO electorial vote objections were heard before the pelosi emergency recess.
THIS IS THE KEY!
Because electorial vote objections were NOT allowed to be made before the peolosi emergency recess occurred, when the US House RECONVENED again to count the electorial votes the emergency rule changes only allowed for an electorial vote count. Electorial vote count objections were not allowed after the emergency session declared by pelosi.
When VP PenceAnd House Speaker Pelosi ended the first electorial vote counting session –They effectively blocked the motions from being heard in normal House rules.
Under the US House rules after an emergency recess the time for any objections/motion on the floor of the US House were OVER and only an electorial vote count with NO objections/motions to suspend could be done. ???
There really is no higher significance of weight given to the debate clause than the certification of the votes. This was more than odd to me the way that the media and Pence framed their narrative: Pence would not have the constitutional power to suspend certification. Then it hit me, like the obvious clue that was there all the time.
He was right. But the reason he is right, is because there WAS NO MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO CAUSE HIM TO SUSPEND!
Pence knew the rules. Pelosi knew the rules.
With no motion on the floor to cause him to suspend the counting of the electorial votes the counting continued with no objections!
The motions were never allowed to be floored in the re-convened House rules later that evening.
Under the US House rules after an emergency recess the time for any objections/motion on the floor of the US House were OVER and only an electorial vote count with NO objections/motions to suspend could be done. ???
This is exactly what Pelosi, Pence and the Uniparty want you to think.
They want you to think no objections or motions could be heard in the US House session after the emergency house recess occurred.
Pelosi, Pence and the Uniparty don't want you to know the truth.
VP Pence could have allowed objections or motions to the electorial vote count.
Read the US House rules.
117 Congress See Rule 1 - The Speaker.
See Clause 12 (b)(1)(2)(c)(1)(2)(d)(e)(f)
https://rules.house.gov/sites/republicans.rules118.house.gov/files/117-House-Rules-Clerk.pdf
I don't see anything about the VP Pence in control of the Electorial vote count NOT being able to allow objections of motions after an emergency recess of the house, do you?
VP Pence could have allowed objections/motions to the electorial votes, but he didn't!
ALL this was done to subvert the US Constitution and install a dictator as "president" in Jan 2021.
VP Pence along with Pelosi are traitors and should face a summary court similar to a George Washington summary court where traitors wwere delt with swift justice!
https://rules.house.gov/sites/republicans.rules118.house.gov/files/BILLS-118hresPIH-118th-rules-of-the-house-of-reps-V3.pdf - (Changes to US House Rules only.)
https://rules.house.gov/sites/republicans.rules118.house.gov/files/117-House-Rules-Clerk.pdf - (The 117th US House Rules included in 118th US House Rules 2023-2025)
What you need to know is the rules for the 118th Congress still has the SAME rules pelosi put in the 2020 US House Rules that ALLOWS for NO Consideration or Objections to Electorial Votes after an emergency has caused the US House to end a house session.
What this means is if another manufactured coup occurs in the 2024 election electorial vote count in Jan 2025, the electorial vote counting could be suspended again and NO Consideration or Objections to electorial votes will be allowed in the next US House session after the electorial vote count is suspended in an emergency.
Keep in mind the US House rules resolution was voted on on Jan 9, 2023 and the vote was - 220-213.
No democrates voteed on the US House rules resolution for the 118th congress 2023-2025.
ALL 220 US House Republicans voted to keep the Pelosi US House rules in effect that allowed the Jan 2021 election electorial votes NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OR OBJECTED TO IN ANY WAY IF ANOTHER "EMERGENCY WAS DECLARED IN THE US HOUSE WHILE ELECTORIAL VOTES WERE BEING COUNTED."
This allows for another "EMERGENCY" to be created to stop ANY objections to electorial votes again in 2024!!!!
Fedsurrection Anniversary Day – They Needed an Emergency Session in Jan 2021 - (To Install a dictator!)
Once again, for those who just walked in…. Following the scale of manipulation within the 2020 election, those who did the manipulation, which included support from the FBI and DOJ, justified to keep their institutional agencies from being exposed, needed to do something to stop any state delegate challenge. One successful state election challenge would have upended the entire system. They needed an emergency session for the January 6th electoral certification.
The pipe bombs found in DC on January 6th, were essentially the insurance policy. The FBI was supporting the need for a stoppage of the 2020 electoral certification session in congress. If the FBI could not manipulate the crowd into entering the Capitol Building, the “discovery” of the pipe bombs would have been used to shut down the certification session. Speaker Pelosi would then gain emergency power, switch to an emergency session upon return, and any effort to challenge the delegate affirmation would be nulled. The latter described action by Pelosi is exactly what happened.
Within the questions: the FBI and government apparatus had advanced knowledge of the scale of the J6 mall assembly yet doing nothing? Why were the Capitol Hill police never informed of the FBI concerns? Why didn’t House Speaker Nancy Pelosi secure the Capitol Hill complex, and why did she deny the request by President Trump to call up the national guard for security support? Why did the FBI have over 200 agent provocateurs in the crowd, seemingly stimulating rage within a peaceful crowd to enter the Capitol Building?
Those congressional floor challenges, known and anticipated well in advance of the morning of January 6, 2021, would have formed a legal and constitutional basis for ‘standing’ in judicial challenges that would have eventually reached the Supreme Court. The certification during “emergency session” eliminated the problem for Washington DC.
I think most, not all, but a large number of people, are totally missing what happened; and why this happened on Jan 6th. I am going to try my best to outline the events that day, blast past the commonly held assumptions and get right down to the core corruption.
I will present this as a series of questions and answers.
♦ Q1: How do you prevent congress from delaying the certification of state electoral votes?
A: It requires a crisis. A crisis that creates an “emergency” …An “emergency” that invokes special house rules.
FACTS: Remember carefully, focus please. Just moments, literally 3 minutes before two representatives issued a vote for motions to suspend the certification, the House members were “informed” by capitol police and other “agents” that a protest was about to breach the chambers. It was at this time that key people: Pence, Pelosi, Schumer, Mcconnell can be seen being walked out and escorted from the chamber. This effectively halted the Entire Chamber Process.
♦ Q2: Why was it necessary to halt the chamber process?
A: The crisis was created to eliminate the motion challenges to halt the certification and to begin voting to look into voting irregularities and fraud
FACTS: The two motions were completely legal and constitutional under at least two constitutionally recognized procedures… procedures that would REQUIRE the house to pause the certification and then vote to determine whether the motions of suspend could move forward.
♦ Q3: What was so important to refuse this motion and the subsequent votes to suspend the electoral certification?
A: It was important to remove that process entirely and continue the fraud and certify the fraud with no detractors on record. This effectively gives no standing for a SCOTUS ruling appeal! Understand this. If those two motions, even just one had successfully been voted EVEN IF THE MOTIONS were DENIED IN VOTE, this gives those who presented them with STANDING FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT BEFORE SCOTUS.
♦ Q4: Could this have been done some other way other than creating a crisis/protest?
A: Unlikely. In order to prevent those two motions, requires that speaker of the house, minority leaders, and the president of the congress (vice president of the United States: Pence), to NOT BE PRESENT IN THE CHAMBERS.
Once the capitol police and other “law enforcements agents” informed the speaker and these three other individuals, Pelosi UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES, suspended the business of the congress. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. By creating a crisis invokes emergency procedures. No other circumstances other than war or mass simultaneous explosive diarrhea can create such unilateral speaker delivered suspension of the certification.
♦ Q5: Why did the motions, once that the speaker RECONVENED congress, move forward back again to the floor for votes? Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?
A: The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!
♦ Q6: Other than new rules, emergency rules, what other peculiar things occurred when the speaker reconvened?
A: Members were allowed to “vote” in proxy, remotely, not being present. You can use your imagination about what conditions were placed on ALL members during this time to prevent anyone from “getting out of line”.
Also clearly, it was at THIS NEW SESSION that VP Pence, President of Congress, would also have no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were no motions of disagreements on the matter. So, in a technical legal claim, he is correct that he had no constitutional authority to address any issues of fraud or doubts about electoral irregularities. But this completely dismisses the FACT that congress created rules in this crisis/emergency that never allowed them to be floored!
Understand what happened in Jan 6, 2021. Don’t get hung up on Viking impostors, stolen Pelosi computers, podium heists, and complicit capitol police. Understand the process and what happened and what WAS NOT ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.
This was a coup….it was a very organized and carefully planned coup. VP Pence without a doubt as well as most members of the house were quite aware of how the certification was going to be MANAGED. It would require new rules to prevent the debate clause from occurring! New rules that ONLY AN EMERGENCY CRISIS COULD CREATE! So, they created an emergency.
•NOTED: I understand why many people have great interest in debunking the j6 event. I get that. I think it is important to dissect and examine the events of that day but please, step back and understand WHY these things happened. Examine the chain of events in congress. Why those two motions that would have at least paused the certification THAT WOULD GIVE VP PENCE THE CONSTITUTIONALLY RECOGNIZED POWER TO MOVE TO SUSPEND THE ELECTORAL CERTIFICATION AND THEN EXAMINE THE IRREGULARITIES AND CLAIMS OF FRAUD!
At the very center of this coup stands Mike Pence, the same individual who also spoiled President Trump’s first opportunities in the earlies hours of his Presidency just 4 years prior, when he created and facilitated the removal of Lt General Michael Flynn. I will not spend much time on this thread explaining why Lt Gen Flynn was so important to President Trump and why the IC was so afraid he would have advisory power to the President. That I will leave for another day, another time. But understand this clearly: MIKE PENCE WAS AND IS WORKING FOR THE MOST CORRUPT CRIMINAL TREASONOUS PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT.
•PRO TIP: If you really want to get a true understanding of this matter videos of protesters walking in the capitol is not going to address them. Actual video and timeline records of events and the specific actions taken by the speaker just moments before TWO MAJOR ELECTORAL ALTERING MOTIONS WERE ABOUT TO BE FLOORED.
This crisis was developed just in time with a precise coordination to prevent those two motions to be entered into the chamber record. The two motions do not exist. The emergency powers established in the new session made sure they never could be entered. The emergency powers could never happen without a crisis.
God Bless America!”
NOTE: “Under this scenario, the J6 pipe bombs were the insurance policy – in the event the feds couldn’t get the crowd to comply with the FBI provocations. If no one stormed the Capitol, the finding of the two pipe bombs would have then been the emergency needed to stop the process.” Which explains why the FBI has no interest in the DC pipe bomb suspects. ~ Sundance TheConservativeTreehouse.com
Note from Author: “I started this effort years ago. To date, no one, and I mean no one, has replied. It’s as if everyone that can expose it that has a larger platform is either disinterested, or suspiciously withdrawn from the issue. I made several comments about this over the years right here at CTH, on article threads that are relevant to the topic.
I was watching the certification live that day. I recorded it ALL on every channel. I was doing this because no matter what happened that day, I KNEW IT WOULD BE A PROFOUND AND SIGNIFICANT EVENT TO REMEMBER. I never in my wildest imagination (and I have a pretty vivid imagination, always have), expected to see the unmistakable perfectly timed “coincidences” that occurred.
One member raises a motion (with another in waiting for his turn) those two motions were well known and advertised. These were motions to vote for a pause in the certification to examine electoral vote fraud and irregularities. I can’t speak to the veracity and substance of those motions. They were never allowed to even be floored. It was at that exact moment that the House chambers were suspended, and 4 of the key members, Pence, Pelosi, Schumer and McConnell were escorted OUT right after initiating the end of the session.
Effectively, this resulted in that motion never being floored at all. Then, when reconvened under special emergency rules, inexplicably those two motions (and perhaps more – we will never know – or will we?) were not even attempted to be motioned. That was not just peculiar to me.
It all started to make more sense when I did some study on constitutional law AND THE HISTORY of specific special authorities given to president of the Congress, Pence in this case. Not only did he have the authority and power to suspend the certification, but the duty to address the motion in the same sense that it becomes vital to the debate clause.
There really is no higher significance of weight given to the debate clause than the certification of the votes. This was more than odd to me the way that the media and Pence framed their narrative: Pence would not have the constitutional power to suspend certification. Then it hit me, like the obvious clue that was there all the time. He was right. But the reason he is right, is because there WAS NO MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO CAUSE HIM TO SUSPEND!
Understanding this happened for me about 4 or 5 months after this Jan 6 day. It took me this long to examine the facts, look at the video again, compare it to the arguments made by several leading constitutional academics, and again, inexplicably even some that I respect seemed to dodge that central reality. The motions were never allowed to be floored in the re-convened House rules later that evening. Most would not even venture to address the exotic coincidence that the moment those two members would stand to place the motion before the house, that the House Speaker Pelosi AND Pence ended the session – effectively blocking the motions from being heard in normal House rules.
It’s been a journey for me. A journey that was initiated because I am just a simple but curious person. Perhaps even to a point where I get obsessive in those efforts. Many days and nights combing over the details – praying and trying to make sense of what makes little sense. With over 6 states having serious well known and obvious defects in the voting process, some more credible to believe – some less, but one would not expect the house would be so deliberate in marching past the motions that were definitely going to be present to slow this process down and take the time to get it right. Even IF the claims never reached an intersection that would change the outcome.
There are two possibilities: Millions of people, against all the odds, hitting all-time records even past Obama and Clinton, voted for a naval gazing ambulatory pathological racist moron, and chose Joe Malarkey as their leader. Or this was a coup, a conspiracy, and a treasonously manipulated regime change, because President Trump could not be controlled by the deep state and globalists who OWN AND OPERATE WASHINGTON DC.
BOTH POSSIBILITIES ARE TERRIFYING.
The only way for THE PEOPLE to gain power in this country is to force the transfer of it. If truth isn’t the fuel and vehicle, we will just be replacing deck chairs and hitting the next series of expected ice bergs.
Knowing the truth is not enough; however, it is truth that makes it a righteous cause.
God Bless America!”
Sundance provides an addendum in support:
Julie Kelly – […] Just as the first wave of protesters breached the building shortly after 2 p.m., congressional Republicans were poised to present evidence of rampant voting fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Ten incumbent and four newly-elected Republican senators planned to work with their House colleagues to demand the formation of an audit commission to investigate election “irregularities” in the 2020 election. Absent an audit, the group of senators, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pledged to reject the Electoral College results from the disputed states.
The Hail Mary effort was doomed to fail; yet the American people would have heard hours of debate related to provable election fraud over the course of the day.
And no one opposed the effort more than ex-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
During a conference call on December 31, 2020, McConnell urged his Republican Senate colleagues to abandon plans to object to the certification, insisting his vote to certify the 2020 election results would be “the most consequential I have ever cast” in his 36-year Senate career.
From the Senate floor on the afternoon of January 6, McConnell gave a dramatic speech warning of the dire consequences to the country should Republicans succeed in delaying the vote. He downplayed examples of voting fraud and even mocked the fact that Trump-appointed judges rejected election lawsuits.
“The voters, the courts, and the States have all spoken,” McConnell insisted. “If we overrule them, it would damage our Republic forever. If this election were overturned by mere allegations from the losing side, our democracy would enter a death spiral.”
Roughly six hours later, McConnell got his way. Cowed by the crowd of largely peaceful Americans allowed into the building by Capitol police, most Republican senators backed off the audit proposal. McConnell, echoing hyperbolic talking points about an “insurrection” seeded earlier in the day by Democratic lawmakers and the news media, gloated. “They tried to disrupt our democracy,” he declared on the Senate floor after Congress reconvened around 8 p.m. “This failed attempt to obstruct Congress, this failed insurrection, only underscores how crucial the task before us is for our Republic.”
Congress officially certified the Electoral College results early the next day. (read more)
The J6 pipe bombs were the insurance policy, in the event they couldn't get the crowd to comply with the FBI provocations. If no one stormed the Capitol, the finding of the pipe bombs would have been the emergency needed to stop the process. https://t.co/JqVcGROAPN
Jan 6, 2021
Right Side Broadcasting. (RSBN)
As you can see On Jan 6, 2021 there was No "Riot" etc until these people were led like sheep into the capitol building by over 200 FBI undercover agents etc along with the capitol police holding the capitol doors open for people attending the Trump rally to enter the capitol buildings.
Inside the capitol buildings were FBI agents dressed up as protestors awaiting the real protestors to guide them in the capitol building.
https://rumble.com/v45jh5x-heres-what-really-happened-on-january-6th.html
https://rumble.com/TuckerCarlson
Sundance theconservativetreehouse.com
I never expected to travel the world of a dollar-based central bank digital currency implementation. Two years ago, I was surprised by the construct of the Western sanctions against Russia; however, my curiosity was driven more by the outcome of the intended economic isolation, and not necessarily about the granular construct of the sanctions themselves.
What surprised me initially, was the conversation that never took place in the financial sector.
I began highlighting the issue MARCH 5, 2022.
The sanctions against Russia were unlike any set of sanctions that came before.
The financial sanctions against Iran, Cuba, North Korea and Venezuela all stood as examples of prior economic sanction constructs, but the financial sanctions against Russia were different.
The SWIFT exchange was shut down, Western trade into Russia was halted, and private Western corporations were forced to divest themselves of assets held within Russia.
Under the guise of “economically isolating Russia”, the sanction regime was driven by the U.S. Treasury, U.S. State Dept., and fully supported by Western allies in Europe, Canada, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. Each of the aforementioned nations followed the exact same path.
Given the history of the prior decade,where Russia enlarged its footprint of influence, the sanction regime just did not make sense.
It was obvious that non-Western nations would continue trading with Russia, and most of those same non-Western nations were trading with the USA.
My simple question was, “won’t alternate countries just step in to fill the void of trade eliminated by the sanctions?”
If, for example, India is still buying widgets from the Western zone, wouldn’t an enterprising Indian company just start buying extra widgets from the USA, Canada or Europe and then begin brokering a portion of those products into Russia?
It seemed like common sense, and indeed that type of exchange is exactly what happened.
Same coffee, tables, chairs, cups, and even employees, just a different name.
Starbucks, and every other Western company was forced to divest, sell assets at fire sale prices, and exit the market.
On the financial side, the inability to work in dollars or Euros was initially a problem, but workarounds were fast to surface {SEE HERE}.
Factually, most Russian people didn’t care, and a large percentage are oblivious to the sanction issue. The sentiment of nationalism or national pride actually increased; they rallied around their leadership.
Two years later, the economy is doing well, Russia is selling energy to nations who have a need, trade is taking place in non-dollar denominations, and the impact is, well, really not much.
However, once you realize the sanctions never had any material impact, then the question is why it was so important to weaponize the dollar-based trade currency?
Surely other nations would now look at their dollar dependency as a potential risk because they too could become a target if the USG made that arbitrary decision.
That’s exactly what happened, and is a big part of the non-Western zone drive to join the antifragile BRICS+ trade alliance.
LARRY FINK in 2022 – NEW YORK, March 24 (Reuters) – BlackRock Inc’s (BLK.N) chief executive, Larry Fink, said on Thursday that the Russia-Ukraine war could end up accelerating digital currencies as a tool to settle international transactions, as the conflict upends the globalization drive of the last three decades.
In a letter to the shareholders of the world’s largest asset manager, Fink said the war will push countries to reassess currency dependencies, and that BlackRock was studying digital currencies and stablecoins due to increased client interest.
“A global digital payment system, thoughtfully designed, can enhance the settlement of international transactions while reducing the risk of money laundering and corruption”, he said.
[…] In the letter on Thursday, the chairman and CEO of the $10 trillion asset manager said the Russia-Ukraine crisis had put an end to the globalization forces at work over the past 30 years.
[…] “While companies’ and consumers’ balance sheets are strong today, giving them more of a cushion to weather these difficulties, a large-scale reorientation of supply chains will inherently be inflationary,” said Fink.
He said central banks were dealing with a dilemma they had not faced in decades, having to choose between living with high inflation or slowing economic activity to contain price pressures. (read more)
(Reuters) – Global bank messaging network SWIFT is planning a new platform in the next one to two years to connect the wave of central bank digital currencies now in development to the existing finance system, it has told Reuters.
The move, which would be one of the most significant yet for the nascent CBDC ecosystem given SWIFT’s key role in global banking, is likely to be fine-tuned to when the first major ones are launched.
Around 90% of the world’s central banks are now exploring digital versions of their currencies. Most don’t want to be left behind by bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, but are grappling with technological complexities.
SWIFT’s head of innovation, Nick Kerigan, said its latest trial, which took 6 months and involved a 38-member group of central banks, commercial banks and settlement platforms, had been one of the largest global collaborations on CBDCs and “tokenised” assets to date.
“We are looking at a roadmap to productize (launch as a product) in the next 12-24 months,” Kerigan said in an interview. “It’s moving out of experimental stage towards something that is becoming a reality.”
Although the timeframe could still shift if major economy CBDC launches get delayed, getting out the blocks for when they do would be a major boost for maintaining SWIFT’s incumbent dominance in the bank-to-bank plumbing network.
[…] A raft of heavyweight commercial banks including HSBC, Citibank, Deutsche Bank, Societe Generale, Standard Chartered and the CLS FX settlement platform all took part too, as did at least two banks from China.
The idea is that once the interlink solution is scaled-up, banks would have one main global connection point able to handle digital asset payments, rather than thousands if they were to set up an individual one with every counterparty. (read more)
ALSO In 2022 – [White House] – President Biden often summarizes his vision for America in one word: Possibilities. A “digital dollar” may seem far-fetched, but modern technology could make it a real possibility.
A United States central bank digital currency (CBDC) would be a digital form of the U.S. dollar. While the U.S. has not yet decided whether it will pursue a CBDC, the U.S. has been closely examining the implications of, and options for, issuing a CBDC. If the U.S. pursued a CBDC, there could be many possible benefits, such as facilitating efficient and low-cost transactions, fostering greater access to the financial system, boosting economic growth, and supporting the continued centrality of the U.S. within the international financial system. However, a U.S. CBDC could also introduce a variety of risks, as it might affect everything ranging from the stability of the financial system to the protection of sensitive data.
Notably, these benefits and risks might vary significantly based on how the CBDC system is designed and deployed. That is why Executive Order 14067, Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets, placed the highest urgency on research and development efforts into the potential design and deployment options of a U.S. CBDC. The Executive Order directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), in consultation with other Federal departments and agencies, to submit to the President a technical evaluation for a potential U.S. CBDC system.
Today, OSTP is publishing its report, Technical Evaluation for a U.S. Central Bank Digital Currency System, which lays out policy objectives for a potential U.S. CBDC system and analyzes key technical design choices for a U.S. CBDC system. The report also estimates the technical feasibility of building a CBDC minimum viable product and describes how a U.S. CBDC system might affect Federal operations. The report makes recommendations on how to prepare the Federal Government for a U.S. CBDC system. Importantly, the report does not make any assessments or recommendations about whether the U.S. should pursue a CBDC, nor does it make any decisions regarding particular design choices for a potential U.S. CBDC system. (read more)
Earp
March 31, 2024 5:11 am
One pretext for US CBDC will be integration with the other CBDC systems globally. That’s why the other systems lead.
It’s all one big movement, one big global shift.
What is the coming end state? The trends point to a future convergence: US Bloc sunk to weak totalitarian vassals under a “multi-polar global governance” with the unannounced seat of power in the East.
It all comes down to scientific prowess and industry – the US lost dominance, the East built it, the rest is “managing the decline” of the US Bloc now.
Pray for our children, as the US is moving toward neo-feudalism and totalitarianism in its coming lowered position.
If you have ever wanted to know why crazy things are happening in this world the article by Sundance (theconservativetreehouse.com) explains it so you can understand the truth.
In his apocalyptic vision in the book of Revelation, the apostle John sees the “beast,” whom we identify as the Antichrist, rising out of the sea having seven heads and ten horns (Revelation 13:1).
Comparing this vision to Daniel’s similar one (Daniel 7:16–24), we can conclude that some sort of world governance system will be inaugurated by the beast, the most powerful “horn,” who will “wage war against God’s holy people and . . . conquer them” (Revelation 13:7).
Whoever the ten nations are and however they come to unite, Scripture is clear that the beast will subdue three of them (Daniel 7:8), and the rest will do his bidding.
John describes the ruler of this vast empire as having power and great authority, given to him by Satan himself (Revelation 13:2).
This ruler receives worship from “all the world” (Revelation 13:3–4) and will have authority over “every tribe, people, language and nation” (Revelation 13:7).
This person will truly be the leader of a one-world government that is recognized as sovereign over all other governments.
Once entrenched in power, the beast (the Antichrist) and the power behind him (Satan) will move to establish absolute control.
In demanding worship, Satan edges toward his goal of being like God (see Isaiah 14:12–14).
Everyone, “great and small, rich and poor, free and slave,” will be forced to receive some type of mark “on their right hands or on their foreheads” in order to buy and sell (Revelation 13:16).
No doubt the majority of people in the world will receive the mark simply to survive.
This new system of commerce will be universal, it will be compulsory, and it will be associated with the worship of the beast (Revelation 13:15).
There is a great deal of speculation as to what form this mark will
take and how it will be affixed, but the technologies available right now could accomplish it easily.
Various Leaders will come and go up until Rev 13:3-4 when the antichrist will control the world for about 3 and one half years.
Its all about control of this world by satan and his desire to rule the world.
In demanding worship, Satan edges toward his goal of being like God (see Isaiah 14:12–14).
The lake of fire is a term used in only a few verses near the end in the book of Revelation (Revelation 19:20; 20:10, 14, 15; 21:8).
Jesus refers to Gehenna/hell several times (Matthew 10:28; Mark 9:43; Luke 12:5), as well as an “outer darkness” (Matthew 8:12; 22:13).
These all seem to be different references to the same thing.
Hell, the lake of fire, and outer darkness are all terms describing the final destination of those who reject Christ.
This is a state of complete separation from God, never-ending and inescapable.
According to the Bible, the lake of fire is the “second death.”
This is the ultimate consequence of sin, which is to be totally cut off from God.
The lake of fire will be a place of perpetual suffering and misery.
Scripture indicates that every person whose name is not in the Book of Life will be cast into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:15).
The lake of fire will also be the fate of the beast and false prophet from the end times (Revelation 19:20), as well as Satan himself (Revelation 20:10).
The Bible indicates that both death and Hades—the temporary destination of the unsaved dead—will also be cast into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:14).
Even though hell is described using terminology such as fire and flame, it is not meant to be thought of as only a physical place.
Hell is described as a place of “torment,” not “torture,” initially intended for purely spiritual beings (Matthew 25:41).
In fact, the worst aspect of hell is an eternity of conscious, guilty, shameful separation from God and all forms of goodness.
In that sense, hell is far worse than a literal inferno; a purely physical hell is actually not as terrible as what the Bible describes.
In other words, the Bible tells us what hell is “like,” using symbols such as the lake of fire.
But Scripture does not tell us too much about what hell “is,” in direct terms.
Fire is often used as a symbol of God’s judgment.
The symbolism stems from real-life examples of God’s use of fire to punish the wicked—the overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19:24), for example, and the destruction of Elijah’s enemies (2 Kings 1:12).
Prophets often described God with a stream of fire coming from His throne, a symbol of His holy punishment of sin (e.g., Daniel 7:10; Isaiah 30:33).
The fact that the destiny of those who reject God is described as a “lake of fire” speaks to how serious the judgment is.
When God finally abolishes sin and death, all sinners will be condemned to the worst possible fate, described in the Bible using the most horrific terms.
We are created in God's image and are eternal beings.
Our eternal spirit lives forever.
Our bodies die but our spirits will never die.
If you die in your sin by rejecting God's free gift of salvation from your sins your eternal spirit will suffer punishment forever in the lake of fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
If you accept God's free gift of salvation through his son Jesus Christ God forgives your sins and your eternal spirit will be with God in heaven forever with a new body.
Please don't reject God's free gift of salvation and eternal life though Jesus Christ.
Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior?
To properly understand this question, you must first understand the terms “Jesus Christ,” “personal,” and “Savior.”
Who is Jesus Christ? Many people will acknowledge Jesus Christ as a good man, a great teacher, or even a prophet of God. These things are definitely true of Jesus, but they do not fully define who He truly is. The Bible tells us that Jesus is God in the flesh, God in human form (see John 1:1, 14). God came to earth to teach us, heal us, correct us, forgive us—and die for us! Jesus Christ is God, the Creator, the sovereign Lord. Have you accepted this Jesus?
What is a Savior, and why do we need a Savior? The Bible tells us that we have all sinned; we have all committed evil acts (Romans 3:10-18). As a result of our sin, we deserve God’s anger and judgment.
The only just punishment for sins committed against an infinite and eternal God is an infinite punishment (Romans 6:23; Revelation 20:11-15). That is why we need a Savior!
Jesus Christ came to earth and died in our place. Jesus’ death was an infinite payment for our sins (2 Corinthians 5:21). Jesus died to pay the penalty for our sins (Romans 5:8). Jesus paid the price so that we would not have to. Jesus’ resurrection from the dead proved that His death was sufficient to pay the penalty for our sins.
That is why Jesus is the one and only Savior (John 14:6; Acts 4:12)!
Are you trusting in Jesus as your Savior?
Is Jesus your “personal” Savior?
Many people view Christianity as attending church, performing rituals, and/or not committing certain sins. (You can't "work your way to salvation".)
That is not Christianity.
True Christianity is a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. Accepting Jesus as your personal Savior means placing your own personal faith and trust in Him.
No one is saved by the faith of others.
No one is forgiven by doing certain deeds. (False religions teach this.)
The only way to be saved is to personally accept Jesus as your Savior, trusting in His death as the payment for your sins and His resurrection as your guarantee of eternal life (John 3:16).
Is Jesus personally your Savior?
If you want to accept Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, say the following words to God.
Remember, saying this prayer or any other prayer will not save you.
Only believing in Jesus Christ and His finished work on the cross for you can save you from sin.
This prayer is simply a way to express to God your faith in Him and thank Him for providing for your salvation.
“God, I know that I have sinned against You and deserve punishment.
But I believe Jesus Christ took the punishment I deserve so that through faith in Him I could be forgiven.
I receive Your offer of forgiveness and place my trust in You for salvation.
I accept Jesus as my personal Savior!
Thank You for Your wonderful grace and forgiveness—the gift of eternal life! Amen!”
